You are here:
  1. Home
  2. Influence: The Psychology…

Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert Cialidini

Influence the psychology of persuasion by Robert B Cialdini book

Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert Cialidini

“The Psychology of Persuasion” by Robert B. Cialdini is a comprehensive guide that explores the principles of influence and how they are used by compliance professionals to persuade people. Cialdini analyzes six key principles: reciprocity, commitment and consistency, social proof, authority, liking, and scarcity. He illustrates these concepts with numerous real-world examples and research findings, demonstrating how these principles operate in various contexts, including sales, marketing, politics, and everyday social interactions. Through his detailed analysis, Cialdini aims to empower readers with a deeper understanding of how to resist manipulative tactics and make informed decisions in the face of influence.

Title: Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion
Author: Robert B. Cialdini
Publication Date: Originally published in 1984 (revised edition released May 4, 2021)
Publisher: Harper Business (revised edition)

  1. Key Concepts
  2. Table of contents
  3. FAQ’s
  4. The Psychology of Persuasion: A Briefing
  5. Study Guide
  6. Glossary of Key Terms
  7. Timeline of Events
  8. Key people mentioned in the book

 

Key Concepts

  • Cialdini introduces the concept of “weapons of influence,” which are psychological principles that can manipulate human behavior.
  • The book is structured around six key principles of persuasion.

The Six Principles of Influence

  1. Reciprocity

    • Definition: People feel obligated to return favors or services received.
    • Application: Offering something small, like a gift or a compliment, can induce a sense of obligation in others to reciprocate.
    • Example: Free samples in stores encourage customers to buy products.

  2. Commitment and Consistency

    • Definition: Once people commit to something, they are more likely to follow through to remain consistent with their initial decision.
    • Application: Getting someone to make a small commitment increases the likelihood of them agreeing to larger requests.
    • Example: Public declarations or signing petitions increase commitment to the cause.

  3. Social Proof

    • Definition: People tend to look to others to determine their own actions, especially in uncertain situations.
    • Application: Highlighting the popularity or endorsement of an action or product can persuade others to follow suit.
    • Example: Testimonials, reviews, and “best-seller” labels.

  4. Liking

    • Definition: People are more likely to be influenced by those they like.
    • Application: Similarity, compliments, and cooperation increase liking and thus influence.
    • Example: Friendly salespeople or spokespeople who share common ground with the target audience.

       

  5. Authority

    • Definition: People tend to obey authority figures and experts.
    • Application: Demonstrating expertise or a position of authority can increase persuasiveness.
    • Example: Endorsements by doctors, experts, or celebrities in advertising.

  6. Scarcity

    • Definition: People perceive items or opportunities as more valuable when they are less available.
    • Application: Highlighting the rarity or limited availability of a product or opportunity can increase demand.
    • Example: “Limited time offer” or “Only a few left in stock” messages.

Application of Principles

  • Ethical Considerations: Cialdini emphasizes the ethical use of these principles, warning against manipulative tactics.
  • Real-World Examples: The book provides numerous examples from various fields, including marketing, politics, and everyday interactions.

Conclusion

  • Understanding these principles not only helps in persuading others but also equips individuals to recognize and resist undue influence.

Key Takeaways

  • The principles of influence are powerful tools that can be used ethically to improve communication and persuasion.
  • Being aware of these principles can help individuals make more informed decisions and avoid being manipulated.

This book is highly recommended for anyone interested in psychology, marketing, sales, negotiation, or simply improving their persuasive communication skills.

The Psychology of Persuasion: A Detailed Table of Contents

Part 1: Decoding the Click-Whirr Response

Chapter 1: Weapons of Influence

  • Introduction: Explores the author’s lifelong susceptibility to compliance techniques and his resulting interest in understanding the factors that lead individuals to say “yes.” (1-2 paragraphs)
  • Exploiting Automatic Responses: Introduces the concept of “click-whirr” responses, automatic behavior patterns triggered by specific stimuli, using examples from animal behavior to illustrate their power. (2-3 pages)
  • The “Expensive = Good” Heuristic: Examines the common mental shortcut that equates price with quality, highlighting how it can be manipulated by compliance professionals. (2-3 pages)
  • The Power of Contrast: Delves into the principle of perceptual contrast, illustrating how presenting something undesirable before a desired option can make the latter seem more appealing, with examples from real estate and retail. (3-4 pages)

Chapter 2: Reciprocation: The Old Give and Take…and Take

  • The Rule of Reciprocity: Explains the deeply ingrained human tendency to repay favors, gifts, and concessions, referencing studies that demonstrate its potency even with uninvited favors. (3-4 pages)
  • Exploiting the Obligation to Receive: Examines how the social pressure to accept gifts and favors can be used to trigger a sense of indebtedness, making individuals more likely to comply with subsequent requests. (3-4 pages)
  • Reciprocal Concessions: Introduces the “rejection-then-retreat” strategy, where an initial larger request is designed to be rejected, making the target more likely to accept a smaller, desired request. (4-5 pages)
  • Defending Against Reciprocity: Provides strategies for recognizing and resisting exploitative uses of the reciprocity rule, emphasizing the importance of redefining initial offers as sales tactics rather than genuine favors. (3-4 pages)

Chapter 3: Commitment and Consistency: Hobgoblins of the Mind

  • The Power of Consistency: Explores the human desire to appear and be consistent with previous actions and statements, explaining how this desire can lead to automatic and often irrational compliance. (2-3 pages)
  • Engaging Consistency: The Power of Commitment: Argues that securing a commitment, however small, is key to activating the consistency principle. (2-3 pages)
  • Public vs. Private Commitments: Examines research demonstrating that public commitments are more enduring and impactful than private ones, making individuals more likely to remain consistent with their stances. (3-4 pages)
  • The Effort Justification Effect: Discusses how enduring hardships or investing significant effort can strengthen commitment to a cause or group, referencing initiation rituals and hazing practices. (4-5 pages)
  • The Lowball Tactic: Details a manipulative compliance technique where an initial attractive offer is withdrawn after securing commitment, causing individuals to rationalize their initial decision and remain committed even with a less favorable deal. (3-4 pages)
  • Saying No to Consistency: Offers strategies for recognizing and resisting the pressure to be consistent when it conflicts with rational thought or personal well-being, emphasizing the importance of listening to “stomach signals.” (2-3 pages)

Part 2: The Shortcuts of Judgment

Chapter 4: Social Proof: Truths Are Us

  • The Principle of Social Proof: Explains how individuals look to the behavior of others, especially those similar to themselves, to determine appropriate action in a given situation. (2-3 pages)
  • The Power of Canned Laughter and Fake Testimonials: Examines how marketers and compliance professionals exploit social proof by manufacturing social evidence through staged testimonials and laugh tracks. (3-4 pages)
  • Uncertainty and Social Proof: Argues that the influence of social proof is heightened in ambiguous situations where individuals are unsure of the correct course of action. (2-3 pages)
  • Bystander Apathy and Pluralistic Ignorance: Explores how the presence of multiple bystanders can inhibit helping behavior in emergencies due to diffusion of responsibility and the misinterpretation of others’ inaction. (4-5 pages)
  • Werther Effect: Suicide Contagion: Discusses the disturbing phenomenon where highly publicized suicides can lead to an increase in similar suicides, highlighting the role of social proof and similarity in these tragedies. (3-4 pages)
  • Saying No to Social Proof: Provides strategies for recognizing and resisting misleading social proof, emphasizing the importance of critically evaluating the authenticity of social evidence. (2-3 pages)
  •  

Chapter 5: Liking: The Friendly Thief

  • The Power of Liking: Explores the persuasive power of those we like, demonstrating how compliance professionals leverage this principle to increase their effectiveness. (2-3 pages)
  • Factors Influencing Liking: Discusses the key factors that influence liking: physical attractiveness, similarity, compliments, contact and cooperation, and association. (4-5 pages)
  • The Good Cop/Bad Cop Tactic: Examines a classic interrogation technique that exploits liking by creating a contrast between a harsh, dislikeable interrogator and a seemingly sympathetic one, making the suspect more likely to confess to the latter. (2-3 pages)
  • Saying No to Liking: Offers strategies for recognizing and resisting the undue influence of liking, encouraging readers to mentally separate the requester from the request when making decisions. (2-3 pages)

Chapter 6: Authority: Directed Deference

  • The Milgram Experiment and the Power of Obedience: Discusses the Milgram experiment, a chilling study that revealed the surprising willingness of individuals to obey authority figures, even when instructed to inflict harm. (3-4 pages)
  • Symbols of Authority: Examines the visual cues and symbols that trigger automatic deference to authority, such as titles, clothing, and trappings of status. (3-4 pages)
  • The Dangers of Blind Obedience: Highlights instances where blindly following authority figures can have negative consequences, emphasizing the importance of evaluating the legitimacy and relevance of authority in a given situation. (2-3 pages)
  • Saying No to Authority: Provides strategies for recognizing and resisting inappropriate influence from authority figures, suggesting questions to ask when determining the legitimacy of authority and the potential for manipulation. (2-3 pages)
  •  

Chapter 7: Scarcity: The Rule of the Few

  • The Power of Scarcity: Explores the human tendency to place a higher value on things that are scarce or becoming less available. (2-3 pages)
  • Psychological Reactance: Wanting What We Can’t Have: Discusses the phenomenon of psychological reactance, where individuals become more motivated to obtain something when their freedom to choose it is threatened. (3-4 pages)
  • Deadline Tactic and Limited-Number Technique: Examines common sales tactics that leverage scarcity, such as imposing deadlines and highlighting limited availability to create urgency and increase perceived value. (3-4 pages)
  • Competition and Scarcity: Explores how competition for scarce resources can amplify the scarcity effect, making individuals more likely to desire and aggressively pursue those resources. (2-3 pages)
  • Saying No to Scarcity: Offers strategies for recognizing and resisting the manipulative power of scarcity, encouraging readers to distinguish between their desire for an item and its actual utility value. (2-3 pages)
  •  

Part 3: Instant Influence

  • Epilogue: Instant Influence: Primitive Consent for an Automatic Age: Reflects on the pervasiveness of automatic influence in modern society, urging readers to be aware of these shortcuts and use them wisely to navigate a world of persuasion. (2-3 pages)

FAQ: The Psychology of Persuasion

1. What is the rule of reciprocation, and how does it work?

The rule of reciprocation is a powerful social norm that dictates that we feel obligated to return favors, gifts, or services that others have provided to us. It stems from the universal desire to maintain fairness and balance in social interactions. This rule is potent because it creates a sense of indebtedness, making us more likely to comply with requests from those to whom we owe something.

For instance, if a colleague helps you with a project, you might feel obligated to help them with one of theirs in the future. Similarly, receiving a free sample at the supermarket can make us feel obligated to purchase the product, even if we didn’t particularly like it.

2. How can the contrast principle be used to influence decisions?

The contrast principle is a mental shortcut where we judge things not by their absolute value, but by their relative difference to something else we’ve recently encountered. For example, a salesman might present a more expensive item first to make a less expensive item seem like a bargain in comparison, even if the second item is still overpriced.

3. What is the rejection-then-retreat strategy, and why is it so effective?

This strategy involves making a large, often unreasonable request first, which is likely to be refused. Subsequently, a smaller, more reasonable request is made – the one the requester intended to get all along. This technique is effective because the smaller request appears as a concession, making the other person feel obligated to reciprocate by complying.

4. How does commitment and consistency affect our behavior?

We have a deep-seated desire to be seen as consistent in our words and actions. Once we make a commitment, even a small one, it subtly influences our self-image, and we become more likely to behave in ways consistent with that commitment. This tendency is often exploited through techniques like the “foot-in-the-door” technique, where securing a small initial commitment increases the likelihood of gaining compliance with larger, related requests later.

For example, getting someone to agree to sign a petition supporting a cause can make them more likely to donate to that cause later.

5. What is social proof, and how can it be manipulated?

Social proof is a psychological phenomenon where we look to the actions and behaviors of others, particularly those similar to us, to determine our own. It’s the “everyone else is doing it” mentality. Marketers and compliance professionals often exploit this by using testimonials, fake lines, or staged social scenarios to create an illusion of popularity or social acceptance for their products or requests.

6. How does the principle of liking influence compliance?

We are more likely to comply with requests from people we like. This principle is exploited through various tactics, such as highlighting similarities, offering compliments, and associating with positive things. Salespeople often use this by being friendly, finding common interests, and creating a positive association.

7. How does the principle of scarcity affect our perceptions of value?

The scarcity principle suggests that we perceive things as more desirable and valuable when they are scarce or difficult to obtain. This is because scarcity implies higher quality and triggers a fear of missing out. Limited-time offers, exclusive deals, and highlighting limited quantities are common tactics that leverage this principle.

8. How can we defend ourselves against these weapons of influence?

Awareness is key. By understanding these principles and recognizing the tactics used, we can become more critical and less susceptible to manipulation. Additionally, learning to identify and challenge our own automatic responses, such as feelings of indebtedness or the urge to conform, can help us make more rational decisions.

The Psychology of Persuasion: A Briefing

Based on excerpts from “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion” by Robert B. Cialdini, Ph.D.

This briefing document outlines the key themes and concepts from the provided excerpts of “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion.” The book delves into the psychological principles that underpin compliance – why people say yes to requests. Cialdini identifies seven primary “weapons of influence”: Reciprocation, Commitment and Consistency, Social Proof, Liking, Authority, Scarcity, and a seventh, briefly mentioned, Unity.

Key Themes:

  • Automatic Influence: Human behavior is often driven by automatic responses to specific triggers, much like pre-programmed tapes. This automatic compliance can be leveraged through specific techniques.
  • Exploitation of Psychological Principles: While these principles serve valuable social functions, individuals and organizations often exploit them for profit or personal gain.
  • Ethical Considerations: Cialdini highlights the ethical implications of utilizing these techniques. He encourages readers to be aware of these tactics to avoid exploitation and promote fair interactions.
  •  

Important Ideas and Facts:

  1. Reciprocation:
  • The Rule: We feel obligated to repay what others have provided us, be it a gift, favor, or concession.
  • Examples:Free samples trigger a sense of indebtedness, increasing purchases (e.g., Amway’s BUG).
  • The “rejection-then-retreat” technique (making a large request followed by a smaller one) leverages reciprocal concessions.
  • Quote: “The rule says that we should try to repay, in kind, what another person has provided us.”
  • Defense: Reframe gifts or concessions from compliance professionals as sales tactics to neutralize the rule’s effect.
  •  
  1. Commitment and Consistency:
  • The Principle: We desire to appear and be consistent with our prior actions, statements, and beliefs.
  • Examples:Foot-in-the-door technique (securing small commitments to influence larger ones).
  • Hazing rituals create strong bonds through demanding experiences.
  • Lowballing (offering a favorable deal, then changing it) exploits our commitment to the initial decision.
  • Quote: “Once we realize that the power of consistency is formidable in directing human action, an important practical question immediately arises: How is that force engaged?”
  • Defense: Recognize when consistency is leading to poor choices and disengage the automatic response by acknowledging the tactic.
  •  
  1. Social Proof:
  • The Principle: We look to others’ behavior to determine our own, especially in uncertain situations.
  • Examples:Canned laughter makes us perceive shows as funnier.
  • Bystander apathy increases when more people are present (diffusion of responsibility).
  • Cults utilize social proof to validate their beliefs and attract new members.
  • Quote: “The story of the Werther effect is both chilling and intriguing.”
  • Defense: Be alert to counterfeit social evidence and actively seek out accurate information to base decisions on.
  •  
  1. Liking:
  • The Principle: We are more likely to comply with requests from people we like.
  • Factors Influencing Liking:Physical attractiveness
  • Similarity
  • Compliments
  • Contact and cooperation
  • Examples:Attractive people receive more favorable treatment.
  • Salespeople use techniques to enhance liking (e.g., compliments, finding common interests).
  • The “Good Cop/Bad Cop” strategy manipulates liking for compliance.
  • Defense: Separate the requester’s likability from the request itself when making decisions.
  •  
  1. Authority:
  • The Principle: We are more likely to obey requests from those perceived as authority figures.
  • Symbols of Authority:Titles (e.g., Doctor, Professor)
  • Clothing (e.g., uniforms, business suits)
  • Trappings (e.g., luxury cars, expensive possessions)
  • Examples:Milgram’s obedience experiment demonstrated the power of authority figures.
  • People are more likely to follow jaywalkers wearing business suits.
  • Defense: Question the legitimacy and relevance of authority in specific situations.
  •  
  1. Scarcity:
  • The Principle: We value and desire things that are scarce or becoming less available.
  • Examples:“Limited-time offers” and “limited quantities” create a sense of urgency.
  • Censorship often increases the desire for the restricted information.
  • Quote: “The joy is not in experiencing a scarce commodity but in possessing it. It is important that we not confuse the two.”
  • Defense: Differentiate between wanting something for its utility value versus its scarcity. Remember, scarce items don’t necessarily function better.
  •  
  1. Unity:
  • Although not explored in detail within these excerpts, Cialdini identifies a seventh principle: Unity. This principle suggests we are more likely to comply with requests from individuals we perceive as part of our “in-group.”
  •  

Conclusion:

Understanding these weapons of influence is crucial for navigating the complexities of human interaction. By recognizing these tactics, we can make more informed decisions, resist manipulation, and promote more ethical and effective communication.

Weapons of Influence Study Guide

Short-Answer Questions

  1. Explain the concept of “click, whirr” in the context of Cialdini’s weapons of influence. (2-3 sentences)
  2. Describe the “rejection-then-retreat” technique and provide an example of its use. (2-3 sentences)
  3. What is the “foot-in-the-door” technique, and how does it relate to the principle of commitment and consistency? (2-3 sentences)
  4. How can the principle of social proof be exploited to influence people’s behavior? (2-3 sentences)
  5. Explain how the “Werther effect” demonstrates the power of social proof. (2-3 sentences)
  6. Cialdini argues that liking is a powerful factor in persuasion. Describe two factors that can increase liking. (2-3 sentences)
  7. What is the “Good Cop/Bad Cop” technique, and how does it leverage the principle of liking? (2-3 sentences)
  8. Explain how the principle of authority can be used to gain compliance, even if the authority figure is not legitimate. (2-3 sentences)
  9. Describe the relationship between scarcity and psychological reactance. (2-3 sentences)
  10. How does the “limited-number” tactic use the scarcity principle to influence purchasing decisions? (2-3 sentences)

Short-Answer Key

  1. “Click, whirr” refers to the automatic and unthinking response elicited by Cialdini’s weapons of influence. These weapons act as triggers (click) that activate pre-programmed behavioral sequences (whirr) within us, leading to compliance.
  2. The “rejection-then-retreat” technique involves making a large request that is likely to be rejected, followed by a smaller, more reasonable request. The concession creates a sense of obligation in the recipient to reciprocate by complying with the smaller request. An example is a salesperson offering a high-priced extended warranty before retreating to a lower-priced option.
  3. The “foot-in-the-door” technique involves securing a small initial commitment, which then makes individuals more likely to agree to larger, related requests later on. This plays on the principle of commitment and consistency, as people strive to maintain consistency with their previous actions.
  4. Social proof exploits people’s tendency to look to others for guidance on how to behave, especially in uncertain situations. This can be exploited by manipulating social cues, like testimonials or popularity claims, to create the illusion of widespread agreement or endorsement.
  5. The “Werther effect” describes the phenomenon of copycat suicides following highly publicized cases. This demonstrates the power of social proof, as individuals in distress may see suicide as a more viable option when they perceive it to be a common response to similar circumstances.
  6. Two factors that can increase liking are similarity and compliments. People tend to like those who are similar to them in terms of background, interests, or opinions. Compliments, even if insincere, can create a sense of goodwill and increase the likelihood of compliance.
  7. The “Good Cop/Bad Cop” technique involves two interrogators, one hostile and one sympathetic. The “bad cop” pressures the suspect while the “good cop” builds rapport and offers a way out through confession. This leverages liking by making the “good cop” appear as a friend and advocate, increasing the suspect’s willingness to comply.
  8. The principle of authority can be exploited by using symbols of authority, such as uniforms, titles, or jargon, to create an illusion of expertise and credibility. This can lead to compliance even if the authority figure lacks genuine expertise in the relevant area.
  9. Scarcity, or the perception of limited availability, increases the desirability of an item or opportunity. This is linked to psychological reactance, which is the tendency to react against perceived threats to freedom and autonomy. Scarcity triggers reactance by limiting our choices, making us want the restricted item even more.
  10. The “limited-number” tactic creates a sense of urgency by suggesting that a product is in short supply. This leverages the scarcity principle by making the product appear more desirable due to its limited availability, prompting impulsive purchasing decisions.

Essay Questions

  • Analyze the ethical implications of using Cialdini’s weapons of influence. Are there situations where their use is justified?
  • Compare and contrast the “foot-in-the-door” technique and the “lowball” tactic. How are they similar? How do they differ in their application and effectiveness?
  • Discuss the role of uncertainty in amplifying the power of social proof. Why are people more susceptible to social influence in ambiguous situations?
  • Cialdini argues that the influence of authority can be both powerful and dangerous. Explain how blind obedience to authority can lead to negative consequences, and discuss strategies for resisting inappropriate authority influences.
  • How can understanding the principles of scarcity and psychological reactance help individuals become more savvy consumers and resist manipulative marketing tactics?

Glossary of Key Terms

Click, Whirr: The automatic and unthinking response triggered by Cialdini’s weapons of influence.
Reciprocation: The social norm that obliges us to repay favors, gifts, and invitations.
Commitment and Consistency: The principle that people feel pressure to behave consistently with their past commitments and self-image.
Social Proof: The tendency to look to others for guidance on how to behave, especially in uncertain situations.
Liking: The principle that we are more likely to comply with requests from people we like.
Authority: The tendency to obey those perceived as authority figures or experts.
Scarcity: The principle that opportunities and resources become more desirable as they become less available.
Psychological Reactance: The tendency to resist attempts to restrict our freedom and autonomy.
Contrast Principle: The perception of something changes based on its comparison to something else.
Foot-in-the-Door Technique: Securing a small initial commitment to increase the likelihood of compliance with larger requests later on.
Rejection-then-Retreat (Door-in-the-Face) Technique: Making a large, unreasonable request followed by a smaller, more acceptable request.
Lowball Tactic: Securing a commitment to an attractive offer, then changing the terms of the agreement to be less favorable.
Werther Effect: The phenomenon of copycat suicides following highly publicized suicide cases.
Guilt by Association: The assumption that individuals share the same characteristics or beliefs as their associates.
Halo Effect: The tendency for a positive impression in one area to influence our overall perception of a person.

Timeline of Events

While a specific timeline is not provided in the text, we can piece together a chronological order of key events mentioned:

Early 20th Century:

  • 1914-1918: A German soldier during World War I captures an enemy soldier. The captive shares his bread with the German, leading him to abandon his mission due to the powerful force of reciprocation. (Source: “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion”)

1930s:

  • Ongoing: Sid and Harry Drubeck use the “expensive = good” heuristic in their tailor shop. Sid pretends to mishear the inflated price Harry quotes, leading customers to believe they are getting a great deal. (Source: “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion”)

Mid 20th Century:

  • Undated, likely 1950s-1960s: An Indiana supermarket sells a large quantity of cheese by offering free samples, triggering the reciprocity rule and encouraging purchases. (Source: “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion”)

Late 20th Century:

  • Undated, likely 1960s-1970s: Social psychology experiments by researchers like Deutsch and Gerard, Moriarty, and Bickman explore the power of commitment, social proof, and authority. (Source: “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion”)
  • 1972: G. Gordon Liddy’s proposal for the Watergate break-in is approved after he presents two increasingly outrageous proposals, making the final, still ill-advised, plan seem like a concession. (Source: “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion”)
  • Undated, likely 1970s-1980s: Joe Girard achieves success as a car salesman in Detroit, utilizing the liking principle to build relationships and sell vehicles. (Source: “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion”)
  • Undated, likely 1970s-1980s: Amway Corporation implements the BUG strategy, leaving customers with free samples to trigger the reciprocity rule and encourage purchases. (Source: “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion”)
  • Undated, likely 1970s-1980s: The author’s personal experiences with the Boy Scout candy sales, the “fire inspector,” and the car salesman (Richard) highlight various persuasion tactics. (Source: “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion”)
  • Post-1970s: The rise of “unrehearsed” testimonial ads with “Consumers from Mars” becomes prevalent, exploiting social proof in advertising. (Source: “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion”)
  • Dade County, Florida, Undated: A ban on phosphate detergents leads to an increase in their perceived value and desirability, illustrating the scarcity principle. (Source: “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion”)

Note: The text primarily focuses on illustrating psychological principles with anecdotal examples, making it difficult to establish a precise timeline for most events.

Key people mentioned in the book

Robert B. Cialdini, Ph.D.: The author and narrator of the excerpts, a social psychologist fascinated by the principles of persuasion and compliance. He recounts personal experiences and analyzes various studies to demonstrate these principles.

Researchers & Social Scientists:

  • Thomas Moriarty: Staged thefts on a New York City beach to study the bystander effect and the influence of commitment on intervention.
  • Leonard Bickman: Conducted studies on obedience to authority, demonstrating the influence of uniforms on compliance.
  • Morton Deutsch & Harold Gerard: Studied the impact of public commitment on people’s willingness to change their opinions.
  • Elliot Aronson & Judson Mills: Conducted a study on the impact of severe initiations on group liking.
  • Muzafer Sherif: Conducted the Robbers Cave Experiment, demonstrating the power of contact and cooperation to reduce intergroup conflict.
  • John Darley & Bibb Latané: Conducted research on the bystander effect, particularly after the murder of Kitty Genovese.

Salespeople & Compliance Practitioners:

  • Sid & Harry Drubeck: Owners of a men’s tailor shop who skillfully employ the “expensive = good” heuristic to influence customer perception and increase sales.
  • Joe Girard: Highly successful Chevrolet salesman known for utilizing the liking principle to build rapport and sell cars.
  • “Phil” (pseudonym): A real estate agent who utilizes the contrast principle by showing clients undesirable “setup” properties before presenting desirable ones.
  • Richard: A used-car salesman who uses competition and the scarcity principle to motivate buyers.

Individuals in Anecdotes:

  • The Boy Scout: Successfully uses the rejection-then-retreat technique to sell candy bars, even though the narrator dislikes chocolate.
  • “Sharon”: The author’s daughter, skilled in psychology, who uses a clever commitment strategy to help her father quit smoking.
  • The “fire inspector”: A potential con artist who uses the reciprocity rule by offering seemingly free gifts to gain access to homes and potentially sell expensive alarm systems.
  • John Mitchell & Jeb Magruder: Involved in the Watergate Scandal, they fall victim to G. Gordon Liddy’s rejection-then-retreat tactic, approving a scaled-back (yet still disastrous) plan.
  • “Tim”: The author’s neighbor, who uses promises of change to win back his girlfriend, illustrating the power of commitment even when not followed through.
  • “Sara”: Tim’s girlfriend who remains committed to him despite his unfulfilled promises, demonstrating how self-justification reinforces commitment.

Other:

  • Johann von Goethe: Author of “The Sorrows of Young Werther,” which sparked a wave of copycat suicides, illustrating the power of social proof.
  • Robert Young: An actor who, despite his lack of medical expertise, was used in Sanka coffee commercials to promote the health benefits of the product, illustrating the authority principle.
  • A mute veteran: Remains silent for thirty years after a traumatic experience but speaks after hearing a soccer match involving his hometown team, highlighting the deep personal connection people feel to sports teams.

This cast of characters demonstrates the wide range of individuals and professions that utilize or are affected by the principles of persuasion.